As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Picks are based on manufacturer specs, independent reviews and owner reports.
Quick verdict
Choose the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker if you want built-in GPS means no phone required for accurate route and pace tracking. Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you'd rather have body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Overall we rank the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker higher: #1 versus #2 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Running list.
Winner overall: Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker
Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker vs Garm in Vivosmart 5 compared
Every difference that matters, in one table.
Keep researching
- Best Fitness Trackers for Running
- Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker review
- Garm in Vivosmart 5 review
- All fitness trackers
Bottom line
Choose the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker if you want built-in GPS means no phone required for accurate route and pace tracking. Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you'd rather have body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Overall we rank the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker higher: #1 versus #2 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Running list.
Top pickFitbit
Built-in GPS means no phone required for accurate route and pace tracking
- Built-in GPS with real-time pace
- 7-day battery (5-6 hours with GPS active)
- Google Maps and Wallet integration
- 40+ exercise modes with automatic recognition
- 50-meter water resistance
✓ Pros
- Body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on
- No subscription needed to unlock any feature, unlike Fitbit or Whoop
- Comfortable, low-profile band that most testers forget they're wearing overnight
- Battery consistently lasts a full week of daily runs with connected GPS
✕ Cons
- No built-in GPS, so accurate route tracking requires carrying a phone
- Touchscreen can misregister taps mid-run when sweaty
- Smaller third-party app ecosystem than Fitbit or Garmin's own watch line
Garmin
Body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on
- Body Battery energy monitoring
- Connected GPS via phone
- Up to 7 days battery life
- Animated on-screen workouts
- No subscription required
✓ Pros
- Body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on
- No subscription needed to unlock any feature, unlike Fitbit or Whoop
- Comfortable, low-profile band that most testers forget they're wearing overnight
- Battery consistently lasts a full week of daily runs with connected GPS
✕ Cons
- No built-in GPS, so accurate route tracking requires carrying a phone
- Touchscreen can misregister taps mid-run when sweaty
- Smaller third-party app ecosystem than Fitbit or Garmin's own watch line
FAQ
Common questions
Which is better, the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker or the Garm in Vivosmart 5?
Choose the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker if you want built-in GPS means no phone required for accurate route and pace tracking. Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you'd rather have body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Overall we rank the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker higher: #1 versus #2 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Running list.
What is the difference between the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker and the Garm in Vivosmart 5?
The Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker stands out because built-in GPS means no phone required for accurate route and pace tracking, while the Garm in Vivosmart 5 stands out because body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. The trade-offs differ too: the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker's ma in caveat is that gPS running continuously cuts battery life to 5-6 hours from the rated 7 days, and the Garm in Vivosmart 5's is that no built-in GPS, so accurate route tracking requires carrying a phone.
Is the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker worth it over the Garm in Vivosmart 5?
For most buyers, yes: it's our #1 pick. Consider the Garm in Vivosmart 5 instead if gPS running continuously cuts battery life to 5-6 hours from the rated 7 days is a deal-breaker for you.
Who should buy the Garm in Vivosmart 5 instead of the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker?
The Garm in Vivosmart 5 suits running, while the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker is best for running.
Keep researching
Related guides & comparisons
ComparisonAmazfit Band 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3Amazfit Band 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3: we break down the real differences, strengths, tradeoffs, and which one fits your situation..ComparisonFitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Vivosmart 5Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garm in Vivosmart 5: we break down the real differences, strengths, tradeoffs, and which one fits your situation..ComparisonGarmin Vivosmart 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3Both made our Best Fitness Trackers for Seniors shortlist, at #1 and #3.Best picksBest Fitness Trackers for Running: Top Picks for Pace, Distance, and RecoveryOur top pick for fitness trackers for running is the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker (for running).Best picksBest Fitness Trackers for Seniors: Simple, Comfortable, and Easy to ReadOur top pick for fitness trackers for seniors is the Garm in Vivosmart 5 (for seniors). 
Garm in Vivosmart 5
