As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Picks are based on manufacturer specs, independent reviews and owner reports.
Quick verdict
Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you want body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 if you'd rather have 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance. Overall we rank the Garm in Vivosmart 5 higher: #1 versus #3 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Seniors list.
Winner overall: Garm in Vivosmart 5
Garm in Vivosmart 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3 compared
Every difference that matters, in one table.
Keep researching
- Best Fitness Trackers for Seniors
- Garm in Vivosmart 5 review
- Samsung Galaxy Fit3 review
- All fitness trackers
Bottom line
Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you want body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 if you'd rather have 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance. Overall we rank the Garm in Vivosmart 5 higher: #1 versus #3 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Seniors list.
Garmin
Body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on
- Body Battery energy monitoring
- Connected GPS via phone
- Up to 7 days battery life
- Animated on-screen workouts
- No subscription required
✓ Pros
- 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance
- 13-day battery life means infrequent charging reminders
- Affordable price makes it easy to replace if lost or damaged
- Simple swipe-based navigation once shown once by a family member
✕ Cons
- Full functionality requires an Android phone, which rules out iPhone-owning seniors
- No irregular heart rhythm notification feature like Fitbit or Garmin
- Smaller companion app ecosystem than Fitbit or Garm in for long-term support
Samsung
1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance
- 1.6-inch AMOLED display
- 13-day battery life
- Sleep and snore tracking
- 100+ workout modes
- IP68 water and dust resistance
✓ Pros
- 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance
- 13-day battery life means infrequent charging reminders
- Affordable price makes it easy to replace if lost or damaged
- Simple swipe-based navigation once shown once by a family member
✕ Cons
- Full functionality requires an Android phone, which rules out iPhone-owning seniors
- No irregular heart rhythm notification feature like Fitbit or Garmin
- Smaller companion app ecosystem than Fitbit or Garm in for long-term support
FAQ
Common questions
Which is better, the Garm in Vivosmart 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Fit3?
Choose the Garm in Vivosmart 5 if you want body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on. Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 if you'd rather have 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance. Overall we rank the Garm in Vivosmart 5 higher: #1 versus #3 in our Best Fitness Trackers for Seniors list.
What is the difference between the Garm in Vivosmart 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Fit3?
The Garm in Vivosmart 5 stands out because body Battery gives runners a clear number for how much they have left to tra in on, while the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 stands out because 1.6-inch display is the largest and easiest to read of the group at a glance. The trade-offs differ too: the Garm in Vivosmart 5's ma in caveat is that no built-in GPS, so accurate route tracking requires carrying a phone, and the Samsung Galaxy Fit3's is that full functionality requires an Android phone, which rules out iPhone-owning seniors.
Is the Garm in Vivosmart 5 worth it over the Samsung Galaxy Fit3?
For most buyers, yes: it's our #1 pick. Consider the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 instead if no built-in GPS, so accurate route tracking requires carrying a phone is a deal-breaker for you.
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 instead of the Garm in Vivosmart 5?
The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 suits seniors, while the Garm in Vivosmart 5 is best for running.
Keep researching
Related guides & comparisons
ComparisonAmazfit Band 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3Amazfit Band 7 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3: we break down the real differences, strengths, tradeoffs, and which one fits your situation..ComparisonFitbit Charge 6 vs Garmin Vivosmart 5Fitbit Charge 6 vs Garm in Vivosmart 5: we break down the real differences, strengths, tradeoffs, and which one fits your situation..ComparisonAmazfit Band 7 vs Garmin vivofit 4 Activity TrackerBoth made our Best Fitness Trackers Under $50 shortlist, at #1 and #3.Best picksBest Fitness Trackers for Running: Top Picks for Pace, Distance, and RecoveryOur top pick for fitness trackers for running is the Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker (for running).Best picksBest Fitness Trackers for Seniors: Simple, Comfortable, and Easy to ReadOur top pick for fitness trackers for seniors is the Garm in Vivosmart 5 (for seniors). 
Samsung Galaxy Fit3
